We’re Punishing Girls For Being Girls?
The word
“provocative” is more often than not used to describe the way a woman is
dressed. In high schools around the United States, girls are continuing to be
sent home due to their “provocative” dress. In the dictionary, the word
provocative is defined as “arousing sexual desire or
interest, especially deliberately.” But, principals and teachers across the country are
defining provocative dress as yoga pants, v-neck shirts, spaghetti straps, and
short-shorts. But, what teacher’s are labeling “provocative”
and “distracting,” girls are feeling confident in, only to be sent home because
boys are paying attention to their boobs rather than the board. And hey, everyone,
newsflash: but you’re making girls feel ashamed
for having a normal female anatomy.
What really makes no sense though, is: Why are we punishing GIRLS for being GIRLS because boys will be boys? It’s important that if a girl is dressed for herself at school, in something that she
feels confident in we do not reprimand her for looking too attractive. I read
in a blog once that, when you interrupt a girl’s school day to send her home to
change, you are enforcing that hiding her
body is more important than her education. You are telling her that making
sure that a boy has a distraction-free learning environment is more important than
her education. ULTIMATELY you are telling
her that HIS education is more important than HERS. What year is this
anyways?
More often than not girls are going
through crucial changes throughout high school and getting accustomed to how
their body fits in clothing. Unfortunately, or maybe fortunately, for society,
girls have boobs. With boobs for any girl, the result is cleavage. Girls should
not be punished and forced to hide what they have no control over having. The difference between girls
appropriately dressing to fit their curves and boys looking, is that girls have
to dress the body they were given; boys do not have to look.
It is crucial that girls be allowed to wear
what they feel comfortable to reinforce confidence, in as long as it looks
appropriate. If girls are showing off assets of their body to an extent where
they can still look like high school students, (with 2 shoulders, 2 legs and a
butt like everybody else) and not school of 16-year-old strippers, they should
be able to wear what they feel confident
in.
Are girls dressing for themselves at school? Or are they dressing so as to attract the male gaze, and all the privilege which then ensues?
ReplyDeleteMr. Hommel, girls do have the ability to dress for themselves. As a former high school female, never once did I wear yoga pants and a T-shirt to flaunt what I have for "male gaze."
DeleteI'm sure it does happen, but we as females don't always dress to encourage the stares of teenage boys. And honestly, in my case, I was too damn lazy to put on jeans (which incase you still are questioning, was in fact, me dressing for myself.)
How one dresses for public (especially high school) will impact how others relate to you whether any thought was put into clothes selection or not. Merely because high school girls have not taken a class explaining the concept of "male gaze" does not mean that they are unable to take advantage of it.
Delete